data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae0db/ae0db45ee7f24f074deed6d6808a46131fc3e5b5" alt=""
If there's a better piece of chicken, the rooster got it.
If there's a better piece of
chicken, the rooster got it.
If there's a better
piece of chicken, the rooster
got it.
Do you need to read that again? Is three times enough? Has it already made you despair for humanity? Right there, amid those eleven little words, lies an encyclopedia of mind-rotting garbage. The chicken—a female and, therefore, worthless as an agent of her own life—is owned by the rooster and by you. The rooster takes her for sexual pleasure, and you… Well, that's between you and the breast-enhanced, winking, flirtatious, bikini-clad bird.
That the sexual and the violent are, once again, conflated by the flesh-pushers is sad and sorry enough. (See the hearts in the logo? Love and death locked in intimate embrace!) That this depraved drama should be carried out in the realm of animals at our mercy is even worse. That Chicken Galore also offers up pigs, fish, and shrimp makes us shudder at the advertising images that might have been.
(Thanks to Dr. aubade for the referral.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9f95/a9f95776884323811a349c95380161316c3ba9e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9f95/a9f95776884323811a349c95380161316c3ba9e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9f95/a9f95776884323811a349c95380161316c3ba9e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9f95/a9f95776884323811a349c95380161316c3ba9e7" alt=""
Addendum: On a less vomit-inducing note, we'd like to comment on the text in the upper right of the image. "The Place For Ribs & Chicken ... The Way You Want It!" We are accustomed to the habits of avoidance that propagate terms like
beef, as opposed to "cow meat," and
pork, as opposed to "pig meat." (Yes, we are aware that the food terms are all of French origin and made their way into English when the French enjoyed power in England.) And we understand that ambiguous terms like
chicken must cause some psychological discomfort. As in "Is this
a chicken I'm eating, or
some of a substance known as chicken?" But here, even "ribs" is reinterpreted as the name of a certain kind of
stuff. (You're not encouraged to eat ribs the way you want
them, but instead the way you want
it, even though the word transparently names particular parts of an animal's body.) Again, we wonder whether our fellow man is already too far gone.